PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

How do historians of modern periods (like the 20th century) go about finding and determining their sources?

The problem isn't scarcity but overload. With the 20th century, we have archives, digital records, newspapers, film, audio, and mountains of bureaucracy. What is the actual process—from formulating a question to sitting in an archive—for systematically identifying which sources are both relevant and reliable for a modern historical topic?

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Sumitra R Answered 1 year ago

The process is iterative. We start not in the archive, but with secondary literature to understand the historiography and identify archival gaps. Then, we target specific repositories: national archives for state papers, university special collections for personal papers, and digital newspaper databases. For modern topics, we also seek audio-visual archives and born-digital records. Determining relevance involves reading finding aids meticulously. Evaluating reliability means asking: who produced this document, for what purpose, and what is omitted? The key is to triangulate—using multiple source types (official memos, diaries, newspapers) to build a corroborated narrative, always mindful of the immense volume and partial perspectives inherent in modern records.

   

Your Answer