PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

3 years ago in Algebra , Mathematics By Nitin

How can the equation Q‑¹(3 + Q(x)) or Q‑¹(3 Q(x)) be solved mathematically?

I'm analyzing a signal processing transform where this form, Q?¹(α Q(x)), keeps appearing. The theory states a property, but I get stuck on the algebraic mechanics of actually isolating x when the inverse is involved. I need to understand the foundational move is it about applying Q to both sides immediately, or is there a more subtle functional consideration first?

 

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Veena Answered 2 years ago

The strategy here is systematic. Your primary tool is to apply the base function Q to both sides of the equation to "unwrap" the inverse. For Q?¹(3 + Q(x)) = c, you would apply Q to both sides, yielding 3 + Q(x) = Q(c). Then, solve for Q(x), and apply Q?¹ again if needed. The critical check, which I've seen cause errors in practice, is verifying that every intermediate value lies in the domain of the function being applied next. Always state the assumed domain explicitly at the start.

 

Your Answer