PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

2 years ago in Astrometry , Astronomy By Akshay R

Which star catalogue is currently the most accurate for astrometry?

I'm planning proper motion studies of star clusters and need the best available baseline data. I've used UCAC4 and Tycho-2 in the past, but I know major new surveys have been released. Is the Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) now the unequivocal best choice for both accuracy and sky coverage, or are there niche cases where other catalogs might still be preferable?

 

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Roopa K Answered 1 year ago

For nearly all modern applications, Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) is the unequivocal foundation. I have seen it revolutionize proper motion studies, with uncertainties for bright stars at the ~0.02 mas/year level orders of magnitude better than pre-Gaia catalogs. Its completeness to G~20 magnitude is unmatched. The only exceptions might be for very bright stars where Gaia's detectors saturate, in which case you might cross-reference with Hipparcos (though Gaia's early DR4 may address this), or for specialized radio astrometry using VLBI. For your star cluster work, I would recommend starting all your analysis with Gaia DR3 as the reference frame. Just be mindful of its completeness limits in very dense cluster cores.

 

Your Answer