PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

Is the complete search strategy for at least one major database provided in full (e.g., in an appendix)?

 In my own work replicating reviews, I often hit a wall where the search strategy is summarized but not provided in full. This makes it impossible to verify the methodology's rigor. As a doctoral researcher, I need to know if journal standards now mandate this level of transparency, as it's fundamental to the scientific process.

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Rohini Singh Answered 1 year ago

In my role on editorial boards, I have seen this be a major point of contention during peer review. I would recommend that any rigorous systematic review or meta-analysis must provide the full search strategy for at least one major database, ideally in an appendix. This isn't just about transparency; it’s a cornerstone of replicability. When I advise my doctoral students, I insist on this practice. Without it, the review’s foundation cannot be audited, which significantly weakens its credibility and utility for the field.

 

 

Your Answer