PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

How can reflexivity be woven into the write-up of a thematic analysis chapter, beyond a single methodological section, to show how your perspective shaped the analysis?

I want my examiners to see how my background and assumptions actively shaped the themes I constructed, not just be told that they did. I’m struggling to move beyond a tokenistic “positionality statement” and demonstrate the live, analytical influence of my perspective within the flow of my results and discussion.

 

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Reeta Khanna Answered 1 year ago

I always advise treating reflexivity as an analytical thread, not a standalone box. In your findings chapter, use brief, integrated phrases. For instance, when presenting a theme, you might write: “My prior clinical experience made me initially resistant to this participant’s interpretation, which is why I returned to these transcripts three times before accepting this as a consensus view.” I have seen this “in-situ reflexivity” transform a flat presentation of themes into a compelling, trustworthy narrative that shows your critical engagement. It demonstrates your analytical journey, not just its destination.

Your Answer