Post Your Answer
1 year ago in Conceptualization , Theme Development By Prachi Patil
Critically discuss the role of existing theory in building your conceptual framework. When is it appropriate to develop a novel framework versus adapting an established one?
As I build my framework, I'm wrestling with a classic PhD dilemma. My literature review shows strong existing theories, but my context has unique elements. I want to be innovative but not reinvent the wheel. How do I critically decide when novelty is a scholarly necessity versus when adaptation is the more rigorous path?
Â
All Answers (1 Answers In All)
By Yusuf ali Answered 1 year ago
This is the heart of a PhD's contribution. I would recommend a two-pronged test. First, examine explanatory power: does an existing theory fully explain the key relationships or anomalies in your phenomenon? If there's a major gap, novelty is needed. Second, consider contextual fit: are you applying a theory to a radically new population or setting where its assumptions may not hold? I have seen brilliant dissertations that elegantly extend a classic theory to a new domain. The key is to explicitly justify your choice adaptation is not a lesser route if it yields new insight.
Reply to Yusuf ali
Related Questions