PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

Are tables and figures used effectively to summarize the scope and characteristics of the evidence?

I've created several dense tables listing all study details.
They are comprehensive but feel overwhelming and might obscure the big picture.
I'm looking for best practices on designing summary tables and conceptual figures that truly aid the reader's understanding, rather than just dumping data.

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Trisha Answered 8 months ago

The key is that every table or figure should serve a specific narrative purpose, not just archive data. I often recommend two key tables: one summarizing included study characteristics (author, year, design, sample) and another synthesizing main findings against your research questions. For figures, consider an evidence map or a conceptual model integrating themes. Ask for each visual: "Does this immediately show a pattern or answer a sub-question?" If not, that data might belong in an appendix. Clarity always trumps comprehensiveness in the main text.

 

Your Answer