Post Your Answer
2 years ago in Manuscript By Aarna
. Is the rationale for a scoping review (as opposed to a systematic review) clearly stated (e.g., to map a complex field, identify key concepts/gaps)?
Is the justification for conducting a scoping review rather than a systematic review clearly explained (for example, to map a complex field or identify key concepts and gaps)?
All Answers (2 Answers In All)
By Kumar Answered 1 year ago
Reply to Kumar
By Manasa Answered 1 year ago
In my experience on review boards, the most common flaw in a scoping review protocol is a weak rationale. I would recommend you explicitly state that your goal is to map a complex, heterogeneous, or emerging field, not to answer a narrow, predefined question suited for a systematic review. Use language like "to identify key concepts, theories, sources, and evidence gaps." I have seen this clarity immediately elevate a proposal’s credibility, showing you understand the fundamental purpose of scoping versus synthesizing evidence.
Â
Reply to Manasa
Related Questions