Post Your Answer
2 years ago in Scholarly Contribution By Aamir
How do I determine if my PhD research is truly "original" or just an incremental addition to the literature‑ I worry it’s not novel enough.
As I write my thesis introduction, I'm struggling to define my work's unique contribution. My supervisors say it's novel, but comparing it to existing studies, the advances feel small. How can I critically assess and confidently frame the scholarly contribution of my project?
All Answers (1 Answers In All)
By Navika Answered 3 weeks ago
From my experience examining theses, originality is often about synthesis and application, not just discovery. Don't just ask "Has this been done?" Ask: "Has this specific combination of theory, method, and context been applied to address this precise gap?" Frame your contribution by its type: are you providing new data, a new method, a new theoretical synthesis, or a critical challenge to existing assumptions? Even a small, precise advance can be highly significant if it solves a defined problem or opens a new pathway. Your contribution lies in the unique intellectual journey you've taken to connect dots others haven't. Focus on articulating that journey's specific value to the field.
Reply to Navika
Related Questions